<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Databases on OranLooney.com</title>
    <link>https://www.oranlooney.com/tags/databases/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Databases on OranLooney.com</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://www.oranlooney.com/tags/databases/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>The Considerate Data Modeler</title>
      <link>https://www.oranlooney.com/post/considerate-data-modeler/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://www.oranlooney.com/post/considerate-data-modeler/</guid>
      <description>What&amp;rsquo;s your hot take on relational databases?
I have an opinion on the matter, or maybe more like an Opinion™: Data modeling is closer to library science than computer science. No one is impressed by a librarian who gets creative and files cookbooks under &amp;ldquo;G&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;Gourmand.&amp;rdquo; The best catalog system is where everything is in an obvious place, where everything conforms to expectations.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>